By now, you probably have heard that the US cyclists arrived at Beijing wearing masks (to protect themselves against bad air pollution there), and how eventually they offered apologies presumably after the US Olympic committee got on their cases.
Almost all the opinions in the US I have read so far seem to be on the side of the cyclists, and take it out on the USOC, IOC, and Chinese govrnment citing various reasons:
- The USOC for influencing the US athletes to apologize particularly when they are the one to design the masks and provide it to their athletes in the first place.
- The athletes have very right to protect their bodies.
- If any, the Chinese government should apologize for having bad pollution in a city where they are hosting an international event.
- Why should US give a rat’s behind for offending the sensibilities of the big, bad Chinese government.
- How the IOC sold out to Chinese government pressure by agreeing to hold in China despite human rights records, and pollution etc.
- How the USOC is selling out by praising the arrangements supposedly just to please the hosts.
- etc. etc.
In my opinion, the display was done in extremely poor taste because I would expect it to offend the citizens of China, although I would not be surprised if many people in the US give a rat’s behind about that either. The common “comeback theme” to this incident is why should we apologize to a government we don’t approve of? The people of China are generally left out of the picture perhaps because it is presumed that they would be blaming their government too. I mean how could they not?
I think many people in the west usually commit a bad mistake in presuming that the citizens of a country ruled by a regime that the west finds oppressive have no pride in their nation. Or more accurately, that people of that country must think like them, and thus have the same anger and disapproval towards their government in all issues. However, what they seem to miss is that while there may be people in that country who hate their government, hate their leaders, they still love their country, its history, tradition, and culture. That love and patriotism runs deep as one would expect. So I think most of them will still want their nation to be projected in a good light in circumstances like the Olympics, even if it is being projected by those “hated leaders”.
So you may not like China’s policies, and you may think that your displeasure is directed only at their government, but perhaps you do not realize that your resulting actions disrespect the people of China. If you care about distinction, then you may realize why an apology is good even if directed at the hated government. If you don’t care, then that is a different story. Like I said, I would not be surprised if many (not all of course!) people here in the US give a rat’s behind about the sensibilities of the peoples of other nations.
I also think that in general athletes at this level value the medals and the fame more than their bodies – a hell of a lot more. And in cycling? Given its legacy? Come on! Now I certainly do not mean to imply every cyclist is involved in doping, which would be a mean and unfair generalization. I am simply pointing out that cyclists do push their bodies to the extreme – it is part of the sport.
So the US athletes think they require a mask just to walk around, but are going participate in a grueling, cycling competition at the international level? Come again?
In any case, nowadays it is all about winning – and that of course manifests in many ways, and also in many harmful ways. And the fame? Ah – here in the US, that comes as part of the giddy, self-adulation that US indulges in nauseating fashion during Olympics. For mainstream US, I wonder if the only reason Olympics even holds interest is to see US athletes win. In fact, I wonder if it is pretty much the only reason US “needs” the Olympics – just to show others how dominant they are. The operative word there is only, as there is nothing abnormal about wanting your country win in every competition it participates in. But the obsessive nature implied here manifests into the lamest TV Olympics TV coverage possible – mainly about US and more about US. NBC and Bob Costas killed the Olympic excitement in me – and they did not take that long. This obsession also manifests in jingoists sports coverage everywhere you look.
In fact, if that obsessive need is not there, then either all these sports would simply fade away in the US, or become localized events. Of course, then the winners of those local events would still be tagged “World Champion this” and “World Champion that”. For example, the baseball league championship is “World Series”, the NBA champions are the “NBA World Champions”, the NFL is “Superbowl World Champions”. So this urge to say “I am the greatest”, “I love myself – I mean I am great”, “See me. Am I not the greatest?” is already well inculcated. This obsession runs deeper – even the fully “US based” ABC news is ABC World news tonight
. It is also the country with the “best health coverage in the world”.
I guess this turned into a rant
August 9, 2008 at 12:40 am
This is no rant. You are pretty much correct in saying that each nation has its sense of pride.The lack of individual liberties, democratic debates, etc makes a monster of China in the eye’s of democratic nations’ eyes and since they are segregated because of it, any offence by other nations and peoples is expected to be excused in the light of China’s own.
August 10, 2008 at 7:23 pm
Thanks maami – I also think it is quite easy to point faults at others than to even begin to comprehend where one’s own faults may lie. But of course I do not think that means one is “disqualified” from pointing faults, as that would simply mean no one would end up being “qualified”.
So as a human being, one does have the right to cry foul about foul acts of other governments etc. based on their values – as a compassionate human being caring for another. However, in doing so, if one also associates himself/herself of his own country (or uses a country as a model), then that is sort of a slippery slope.
So people in the west may certainly lament about lack of human rights in some country – rights they do enjoy. But if they also identify too much with their country/government in doing so (e.g. why cant their country be like mine), then they need to also be aware if their country has violated/violating human rights also (and express the same kind of feelings). And in the case of US, such violations happened during nation building (i.e. w.r.t native americans), it happened during 2nd world war, Vietnam and in Iraq. So it has happened all along and is happening now. Of course, just like with every country, even here with jingoistic nationalism, in the minds of many including mainstream media, it ends up being justified (Guantanamo), or ends up being clubbed as “collateral damage” (how many iraqi civilians died now?) in the path of “doing good for the world”. In the case of western european countries – they have made quite a mess of 3rd world in the name of colonization and the effects are still being played out.
Interestingly, this “destiny” to spread western democracy and its values thing – it is pretty much the new version of colonization. It is *precisely* the same sentiment (to the tee), the colonists used to justify “taking over” new lands they “discover” by usurping rights of the indigenous peoples, who end up having less rights than the citizens of the colonists. This was justified by saying they were doing so because they were “civilizing” those people.
Dont mistake me – I am all for democracy, freedom of expression etc. – but I think once gets the above mind set, prejudices seep in, get set, which may led you to commit the same mistakes that you are find in others and you don’t even have awareness of it.
Now – that must be a rant
Arun
August 11, 2008 at 12:10 am
Whoa! There’s a ranting man behind this musical soul?